Skip to main content

What are some ways of being creative in your writing?

This was a question in "The Writer's Nook" section of Quora.

As usual, my answer slides off the point, but it sets down a number of things about writing that I believe.

*

Writers’ courses and groups focus too much on creativity.

That got your attention, but it wasn’t creative.

Forced creativity is like a foreign accent: you can’t hide it.

If you are a writer, you will find both a voice and something to say. Brilliant writers with nothing to say become historians - and there is always a need and market for readable history.

The alternative is to be like E M Forster who dried up in 1927 but was hailed as the century’s greatest novelist when he died fifty years later.

Reading widely is the cure for many faults in writing. Study the masters, just like aspiring artists and learn the craft of writing. Many can learn the craft; few can learn the art - arguably, it can’t be learned.

Aim to be readable. Read the masters out loud. Read your own work out loud.

Previous generations had the benefit of good music that varied its rhythms and its shading. They knew how to dance; how to FEEL the movement. Without that in our daily lives, we lose (or don’t develop) any real sense of rhythm, and it affects our prose.

Here’s another approach, try writing with a fountain pen on decent paper (hard to find in America). It stops the flood of words that can be spewed onto a computer monitor. Writing by hand at least means that what you are writing spends a little more time in the brain.

[I always thought there was a good PhD topic in studying the effect on prose that moving from using dip pens to fountain pens had on writing styles. With computers, this should now be possible.]

Focus on learning the craft first. Give your ideas and characters the freedom to evolve; let them determine the plot.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he
2 comments
Read more

Reflections - Moby Dick

Has anyone read all of Moby Dick ? Congratulations if you have. I hope you enjoyed it. I've started it half a dozen times; it was required reading for at least three courses I took over the years, but I never finished it. Each time I began, I felt that this was a wonderful book, to be read at the pace that a whaling ship travelled. If you read it carefully and let it go at its own speed, you can feel the roll and pitch of the Pequod , and catch the fresh scent of the sea, and the stale smell of Ishmael, Queequeeg, and the crew. Forget the interpretations people have told you about the symbol of the whale; of Ahab's vision of a malevolent God. Let the whale and Ahab explain themselves. Try to listen to Ishmael, and put your own urgencies and the 21st century world out of your head, and slow to that pitch and roll. The detail about whales and whaling is almost overwhelming. Melville is like the best of hunters: he knows - and one suspects, loves -
2 comments
Read more

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few
1 comment
Read more