Skip to main content

REVIEW: Miss Eleanor Tilney: or, The Reluctant Heroine, by Sherwood Smith

 

I have always admired Eleanor Tilney. Though a minor character in Northanger Abbey, I believe she is one of the most intelligent women in 19th century literature, right up there with Marian Halcombe. In this short novel, Sherwood Smith recognises Eleanor's intelligence and good sense. She also develops some depth in her, showing her to be caring and sensitive, and deserving of a good, loving marriage.

While Eleanor demonstrates a strong, yet gentle, nature, she did strike me as being rather idle, unlike, say, Emma, who is always trying to do good, or the Bennetts who are always busy with needlework, helping each other or working in the family kitchen. Now, it would not be right for Eleanor to work in the kitchen, but she does not even pick up a pair of secateurs. She is not musical either, though she dances well enough.

Smith's depiction of Catherine Moreland is almost indistinguishable from Austen's and she fits into this pastiche with admirable ease. There is a clever device of having Henry Tilney teasing Catherine with stories and gothic attributes to be found within Northanger Abbey, which feed her imagination and give a stronger motivation and context to Catherine's subsequent imaginings and actions.

The descriptions of the Thorpes are perfectly in tune, as are those of the gentle, generous Allens. However, Smith shines with her development of General Tilney. Though not as potentially sinister as in the original, his mercurial behaviour and snobbery are well portrayed but do not go over the top. Indeed, the General in this book is wholly consistent with Robert Hardy's brilliant portrayal of him in the 1987 BBC/Screen Two production.

Sherwood Smith's plotting is clever, paralleling and supplementing Northanger Abbey admirably, but not duplicating the narrative. Seeing things from Eleanor's point of view also makes the familiar scenes fresh. Jane Austen is guilty of using Deus ex Machina endings, so Smith cannot be criticised for that, but the ending is rather abrupt.

On the other hand, the book maintains a modern pace and is highly entertaining. The language, apart from a few anachronisms (no Jane Austen character ever would have "gifted" anything to anyone), the language pays appropriate homage to Jane's 18th/19th century vocabulary, and may send the reader to the dictionary once or twice. (A further proof that the reader is not wasting his time!)

I would have liked to have seen more extended dialogue and perhaps some more physical descriptions of the surroundings - especially Northanger Abbey itself - but this a personal preference and not a failing of the book.

Lovers of Northanger Abbey (the book has something of a cult following) will not be disappointed at revisiting the abbey and its inhabitants in this amusing novel.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he
2 comments
Read more

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few
1 comment
Read more

Jonathan Creek Revisted

  Having watched the last episode of The Capture,  I was looking for something equally intriguing but not as frightening. I decided to re-watch the old episodes of Jonathan Creek . Like everyone else, I have my favourite episodes and they are enhanced by the actors and settings. The series had the ability to draw one in and make everything seem possible, if unlikely. However, the re-watching exercise only reinforced my view that Maddy Magellan was possibly the most irritating character who has been on television in more than a generation. I can throw the usual abuse at her, but her most egregious sins are that she is irredeemably selfish and, throughout the series, she never learns anything . She appears in 18 episodes and is as stupid in the last as she was in the first. Her selfishness not infrequently crosses the line from being mildly amusing to downright mean. For all of her emancipated liberalism, she is an objectionable human being (I leave it others to decide whether that is ca
Post a Comment
Read more