Skip to main content

Thinking about the past

Depending on your definition, I have written a number of historical novels. Portland Place and Wachusett are set in the 19th century. Lost Lady is set in the 1920s, and Nantucket Summer and The Countess Comes Home are set in late 1960s and early 70s.

While I would not have considered the 1920s to be a historical novel setting because it's the time when my parents were growing up, it is now a hundred years ago. As for the 60s and early 70s, as far as today's youth is concerned, that was shortly after the Jurassic period.

What writing these books has meant - and I never set out to be an historical novelist - is that I spent a lot of time looking into daily life in the periods covered. Finding out what people ate at a mountain resort hotel in 1876, or how they lit their rooms was fascinating, and not easy to discover. Fortunately, today there are some wonderful resources for historical novelists on the web and this information can be winkled out.

Another unexpected source was eBay. A lot of paper ephemera comes up for sale and, with regular watching, I was able to turn up a tariff and sample menu for the long-gone hotel I was writing about.

Sometimes, the things you discover are unexpectedly thought-provoking. 

An example of this came when not long ago, my mother was down-sizing and gave me a painting by her father. I had always loved it. It had hung in my aunt's house, and when she went into a nursing home, I expected the picture to be passed to her children, but it went to my mother.

My grandfather's listed occupation was photographer but his work covered what would be described as a graphic designer today. He began taking pictures in the 1880s and continued to do so until his death in 1945. He was also a reasonable amateur painter and was friends with the noted painter of Civil War naval battles, Xanthus Smith. Smith must have thought him a decent painter as they used to paint together, and my mother remembered playing at Smith's "castle" outside Philadelphia as a little girl.

I find the painting (below) of the beach at Ocean City, New Jersey, fascinating for a number of reasons. First, it's in a portrait format. This is unusual for landscapes of any sort, and remarkable for a seascape (though this is more a skyscape). Secondly, the horizon is less than a third of the way up the painting. The ocean itself, in minuscule, yet the waves are beautifully painted and translucent.


It was painted in 1940, so by the time I received it, it had 75 years' of grime and smoke and discoloured varnish. I had it cleaned, and there was a surprise.

On the horizon, what I had taken to more cloud or mist was revealed to be smoke from passing ships, en route to and from New York or Philadelphia. While no ship is depicted, there is a clear (or not-so-clear) source of smoke about a third of the way along from the left.



There are people today who moan about contrails carving up the sky, but compared to what the smokey seas smelling of coal must have been like, some linear vapour trails are a pretty minor annoyance.

My intention isn't to start an environmental argument but to note the selectivity of what is recorded. Smoke on the horizon does not figure in family tales about days at the beach, but they were very much part of the experience.

G. C. Ramsey in his book Agatha Christie: Mistress of Mystery (Dodd, Mead, 1967), observes that ordinary, even mediocre, detective fiction creates a stunningly detailed picture of life in the period portrayed. With every object potentially a clue, it is important to  camouflage the real clues in a shoal of red herrings. [NB, Ramsey was granted the first interview given by Christie since her disappearance in 1926.]

In consequence, readers are able to picture a room with remarkable precision, complete with antimacassars, Morris chairs, push-button light switches, Hawthorne strainers, Du Maurier ovals, and other ephemera of the period.

Perhaps there are novels in which smokey horizons get a mention, but they probably date from the transition from sail to steam, and not the 20s, 30s and 40s when coal smoke would have been commonplace.

Writers - especially historical novelists - are confronted with a bizarre collection of historic nuts to crack, and pursuit of esoteric questions can itself turn into a detective story.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spirit of the North: One Knock for Yes!

Ian Thomson ’ s Northern Trilogy (beginning with The Northern Elements and Northern Flames ) weaves history, nostalgia, and autobiography into highly engaging and thought-provoking tales. Spirit of the North is no different in that, but it is different. The plot looks at three episodes of spiritualism, two relatively harmless, and one with serious consequences. While the first two are reminiscent of Agatha Christiesque table-turning, the third involves murder. This is the one that leads to a serious investigation by Tom Catlow with his childhood friend, Will Melling, playing Watson. Readers met these two mischievous friends in The Northern Elements . Tom is a retired police Senior Scientific Officer (Forensics) and Will a former sports journalist. Now to fill their time, Tom and Will investigate another very old case while continuing their friendship with teasing and banter. The third main character is long-dead. Cornelius Pickup, was a successful businessman, kind employer, a...

Jonathan Creek Revisted

  Having watched the last episode of The Capture,  I was looking for something equally intriguing but not as frightening. I decided to re-watch the old episodes of Jonathan Creek . Like everyone else, I have my favourite episodes and they are enhanced by the actors and settings. The series had the ability to draw one in and make everything seem possible, if unlikely. However, the re-watching exercise only reinforced my view that Maddy Magellan was possibly the most irritating character who has been on television in more than a generation. I can throw the usual abuse at her, but her most egregious sins are that she is irredeemably selfish and, throughout the series, she never learns anything . She appears in 18 episodes and is as stupid in the last as she was in the first. Her selfishness not infrequently crosses the line from being mildly amusing to downright mean. For all of her emancipated liberalism, she is an objectionable human being (I leave it others to decide whether t...

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he...