Skip to main content

Review: Our Roots Remain as One


Our Roots Remain as One by David G Muller, Jr, Deborah Muller Kemp, Kristina Muller Wells, Janice Muller Hollinger

The value of family histories and recollections is that they show us just how much the world has changed within living memory. The memories of the Mullers from the 1950s and 60s (as well as later) give an honest picture of life through the eyes of four siblings (one boy, three girls).

Organising four family members to take the time to write down their recollections is a serious challenge, and the fact that the four Muller children, now nearly all at retirement age, have been able to do this is a major accomplishment.

The format is elegantly simple. Each of the four wrote short pieces on key stages of their lives: earliest memories, various stages of school, lives outside school, college years, and making life decisions. Through those brief essays, history and growth are recorded. Sections where they give accounts of the same events of their youth are particularly interesting.

The book is a reminder of the value of individual families and lives, and it is refreshing to read about four children raised in post-industrial Massachusetts and Ohio who didn’t go off the rails and are still speaking, supporting and visiting each other. They have served their country in different ways and have been active and responsible citizens and raised their children to respect these values.

It is regrettable that in our digital age so much is ephemeral. Our faith in digital data, in the opinion of this old man, is badly misplaced. Just try to get a bank record from only a decade  ago. 

So, to have a printed family record of late 20th century America is noteworthy, and more families should take the opportunity to record their lives, otherwise all posterity will be left with are the fatuous and largely fictitious accounts of long-forgotten “celebrities.”

While celebrities might make “trends” that last for a few weeks, and politicians write best-selling memoirs that are largely unread, it is ordinary families who shape the real future of the world, and understanding those lives is where real history lies.

What’s in Our Roots Remain as One for readers who didn’t know the Mullers? A clear snapshot of a time and place; a history of personal intellectual and spiritual growth and development; a record of how four individuals fit into one family and made the transition from youth to age while still respecting, loving  and forgiving each other; and, a better understanding of how character is built. After 20 years in the Navy, Dave worked as an analyst for an alphabet of government agencies, then as a consultant, and now in retirement is a writer. Deb became a police officer in Colorado; Kris had a career in nursing; and, Jan was an elementary school teacher. How and why they chose these jobs has broader interest, and it is worth noting that each of these careers were ones that contributed in a direct way to the country, community and to individual lives.

While they had many achievements and important accomplishments, none can be considered famous. I am reminded of Sir Thomas More's reply to Richard Rich when the latter - hungry for fame - asks more who would know if he became a good teacher: "You; your pupils; your friends; God. Not a bad public, that."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few

Jonathan Creek Revisted

  Having watched the last episode of The Capture,  I was looking for something equally intriguing but not as frightening. I decided to re-watch the old episodes of Jonathan Creek . Like everyone else, I have my favourite episodes and they are enhanced by the actors and settings. The series had the ability to draw one in and make everything seem possible, if unlikely. However, the re-watching exercise only reinforced my view that Maddy Magellan was possibly the most irritating character who has been on television in more than a generation. I can throw the usual abuse at her, but her most egregious sins are that she is irredeemably selfish and, throughout the series, she never learns anything . She appears in 18 episodes and is as stupid in the last as she was in the first. Her selfishness not infrequently crosses the line from being mildly amusing to downright mean. For all of her emancipated liberalism, she is an objectionable human being (I leave it others to decide whether that is ca