Skip to main content

Do women know when they're being sexist?

When I was first married and returned to work, over lunch a female colleague asked me why I wasn't wearing my wedding ring.

"You make your wife wear one. Why shouldn't you? What makes men think that can do these things?"

Even though newly married, I knew enough to wait until the diatribe stopped. Eventually, it did and was punctuated by the demand, "Well?"

"My wife doesn't like wedding rings for men. She didn't give me one."

In the delightful silence, I asked, "Who's being sexist now?"

I was reminded of this while watching an episode of "The Catch" - a series that should be much better than it is.

An Interpol agent asks the heroine (so memorable I've forgotten both the name of the character and the actress), "Are you okay?"

To which the less than grateful reply was, "Would you ask me that if I were a man?"

The guy looks sheepish, and the camera cuts away.

This flaccid pseudo-feminist sort of dialogue needs stamping on. Hard. It does the cause for alleged equality no good. Women deserve better, and this sort of drip drip feed into the male psyche needs to be done with much more intelligence.

When are we going to see a serious response to such questions? He should have responded, without apology, "Well, you're not a man, and if you were, you wouldn't be acting the way you are."

Only when the narrative improves will serious discourse become possible. Until then, it's simple metoo-ism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few

Jonathan Creek Revisted

  Having watched the last episode of The Capture,  I was looking for something equally intriguing but not as frightening. I decided to re-watch the old episodes of Jonathan Creek . Like everyone else, I have my favourite episodes and they are enhanced by the actors and settings. The series had the ability to draw one in and make everything seem possible, if unlikely. However, the re-watching exercise only reinforced my view that Maddy Magellan was possibly the most irritating character who has been on television in more than a generation. I can throw the usual abuse at her, but her most egregious sins are that she is irredeemably selfish and, throughout the series, she never learns anything . She appears in 18 episodes and is as stupid in the last as she was in the first. Her selfishness not infrequently crosses the line from being mildly amusing to downright mean. For all of her emancipated liberalism, she is an objectionable human being (I leave it others to decide whether that is ca