Skip to main content

Popular Fiction or Literature? 1

One afternoon while marking papers around the large table in the common room of a minor English public school, the question of what was popular fiction and what was literature came up.

One of my colleagues, now a distinguished novelist, said, "Popular fiction is about money, sex and death. Literature is about God, sex and death."

I've considered that definition over the intervening decades, and have come to the conclusion that it is more satisfactory than most. It's simplicity is deceptive. 

The line between the categories is sometimes very fine, good writing can make the difference. It's not about being profound; it's about expressing ideas clearly; creating memorable scenes and characters.

Here, in no particular order, are some books that will probably still be read a hundred years from their first publication, though they may be out of favour now:

  • The Caine Mutiny, Herman Wouk, 1951
  • 1876, Gore Vidal, 1976
  • The Last Convertible, Anton Myrer, 1978
  • The Rector of Justin, Louis Auchincloss, 1964
  • Ada, Vladimir Nobokov, 1969
  • To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee, 1960
  • Breakfast at Tiffany's, Truman Capote, 1958
  • A Gentleman in Moscow, Amor Towles, 2016
  • The Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison, 1952
  • The Shadow of the Wind, Carlos Ruiz Zafon, 2001
This will start the ball rolling, and future posts will look at several of these along with other classic favourites that may or may not be "literature".

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spirit of the North: One Knock for Yes!

Ian Thomson ’ s Northern Trilogy (beginning with The Northern Elements and Northern Flames ) weaves history, nostalgia, and autobiography into highly engaging and thought-provoking tales. Spirit of the North is no different in that, but it is different. The plot looks at three episodes of spiritualism, two relatively harmless, and one with serious consequences. While the first two are reminiscent of Agatha Christiesque table-turning, the third involves murder. This is the one that leads to a serious investigation by Tom Catlow with his childhood friend, Will Melling, playing Watson. Readers met these two mischievous friends in The Northern Elements . Tom is a retired police Senior Scientific Officer (Forensics) and Will a former sports journalist. Now to fill their time, Tom and Will investigate another very old case while continuing their friendship with teasing and banter. The third main character is long-dead. Cornelius Pickup, was a successful businessman, kind employer, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jonathan Creek Revisted

  Having watched the last episode of The Capture,  I was looking for something equally intriguing but not as frightening. I decided to re-watch the old episodes of Jonathan Creek . Like everyone else, I have my favourite episodes and they are enhanced by the actors and settings. The series had the ability to draw one in and make everything seem possible, if unlikely. However, the re-watching exercise only reinforced my view that Maddy Magellan was possibly the most irritating character who has been on television in more than a generation. I can throw the usual abuse at her, but her most egregious sins are that she is irredeemably selfish and, throughout the series, she never learns anything . She appears in 18 episodes and is as stupid in the last as she was in the first. Her selfishness not infrequently crosses the line from being mildly amusing to downright mean. For all of her emancipated liberalism, she is an objectionable human being (I leave it others to decide whether t...
Post a Comment
Read more

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he...
2 comments
Read more