Skip to main content

Popular Fiction or Literature? 1

One afternoon while marking papers around the large table in the common room of a minor English public school, the question of what was popular fiction and what was literature came up.

One of my colleagues, now a distinguished novelist, said, "Popular fiction is about money, sex and death. Literature is about God, sex and death."

I've considered that definition over the intervening decades, and have come to the conclusion that it is more satisfactory than most. It's simplicity is deceptive. 

The line between the categories is sometimes very fine, good writing can make the difference. It's not about being profound; it's about expressing ideas clearly; creating memorable scenes and characters.

Here, in no particular order, are some books that will probably still be read a hundred years from their first publication, though they may be out of favour now:

  • The Caine Mutiny, Herman Wouk, 1951
  • 1876, Gore Vidal, 1976
  • The Last Convertible, Anton Myrer, 1978
  • The Rector of Justin, Louis Auchincloss, 1964
  • Ada, Vladimir Nobokov, 1969
  • To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee, 1960
  • Breakfast at Tiffany's, Truman Capote, 1958
  • A Gentleman in Moscow, Amor Towles, 2016
  • The Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison, 1952
  • The Shadow of the Wind, Carlos Ruiz Zafon, 2001
This will start the ball rolling, and future posts will look at several of these along with other classic favourites that may or may not be "literature".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he

Reflections - Moby Dick

Has anyone read all of Moby Dick ? Congratulations if you have. I hope you enjoyed it. I've started it half a dozen times; it was required reading for at least three courses I took over the years, but I never finished it. Each time I began, I felt that this was a wonderful book, to be read at the pace that a whaling ship travelled. If you read it carefully and let it go at its own speed, you can feel the roll and pitch of the Pequod , and catch the fresh scent of the sea, and the stale smell of Ishmael, Queequeeg, and the crew. Forget the interpretations people have told you about the symbol of the whale; of Ahab's vision of a malevolent God. Let the whale and Ahab explain themselves. Try to listen to Ishmael, and put your own urgencies and the 21st century world out of your head, and slow to that pitch and roll. The detail about whales and whaling is almost overwhelming. Melville is like the best of hunters: he knows - and one suspects, loves -

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few