Skip to main content

Does anyone else think that flying is badly engineered?

I recently flew back from France. It was a quick flight on a BA A320 and very smooth and comfortable.

 However, it made me think that there are a number of things about flying that are very badly thought out.

 1. Boarding. Planes board by group and perversely, the first to board (apart from the very old and the very young)are those sitting at the front of the plane. That way, they can be in the way of Group 2, and both can be in the way of Group 3 so that by the time Group 4 gets on board, it takes half the scheduled flight time to crawl over and around the first three groups and their baggage to reach one's seat.

 Now, I know that this is something to do with putting too much weight at the back of the plane while the front is empty, but it seems to me that the designers of something that weighs 575 tons (A380) and cruises at Mach 0.85 could sort out a way of boarding more sensibly - perhaps using a rear door.

 2. Baggage.Why is it that if you arrive at the airport in good time and check in that your bag is among the last to appear at the baggage claim at the other end? Mine is always nearly last - except this time, when I checked in with about an hour to spare: it was the second one on the conveyor. Hardly seems fair.

 3. Boarding again. The Eurostar makes two-minute stops at interim stations. Passengers are on the platform at places where the doors to their carriage will stop. Several hundred people can board in that time. Why is there only ONE door for boarding a 747, an A380 - or any other plane carrying more than a dozen people? What it is, is that thinking has got too deep into a rut and no one is even considering alternatives.

 4. Baggage again. With all the mechanisation and automation available, why is it considered better and safer?) to encourage large carry-on bags rather than storing them in the hold? It's containerised already so why all the additional weight in the overhead? It must alter the centre of gravity and affect stability, especially given how variable that weight is.

 5. Check-in. I won't moan more than to observe that 'Baggage drop' today takes just as long as check-in used to.

 Efficiency experts - there's your cue!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections - Moby Dick

Has anyone read all of Moby Dick ? Congratulations if you have. I hope you enjoyed it. I've started it half a dozen times; it was required reading for at least three courses I took over the years, but I never finished it. Each time I began, I felt that this was a wonderful book, to be read at the pace that a whaling ship travelled. If you read it carefully and let it go at its own speed, you can feel the roll and pitch of the Pequod , and catch the fresh scent of the sea, and the stale smell of Ishmael, Queequeeg, and the crew. Forget the interpretations people have told you about the symbol of the whale; of Ahab's vision of a malevolent God. Let the whale and Ahab explain themselves. Try to listen to Ishmael, and put your own urgencies and the 21st century world out of your head, and slow to that pitch and roll. The detail about whales and whaling is almost overwhelming. Melville is like the best of hunters: he knows - and one suspects, loves -
2 comments
Read more

First Lines

First lines are first impressions Teachers of creative writing are always bleating about the importance of first lines. They're not wrong, but a first line isn't make-or-break. Many excellent novels have indifferent first lines, but their significance is often created by the fact that they are the opening lines of great books; they are not great books because they have killer opening lines. Consider the first line of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities . it rambles on for 119 words, and demonstrates that Dickens had no understanding of the semi-colon. Most people can only remember the first dozen words; show-offs know the first two dozen. Dickens was being paid by the word, and was a master at turning one good idea into a whole chapter. (Don't misunderstand me: A Tale of Two Cities is one of my favourite books.) First lines are like book titles. They can take a while for the writer to feel satisfied with them, but often, they don't really matter. When asked what he
2 comments
Read more

Was Scrooge Conned?

It would be interesting to trace the tradition of the Christmas ghost story beyond the superficial (see below). I am sure it is related to the darkness and cold of the year and people huddled around a fire for comfort and warmth, but the association with Christmas and ghosts is incongruous - or is it? Yes, there were pagan mid-winter feasts, but it's hard to see why they would emerge in the 18th and 19th centuries when ghost stories rose in popularity. Dickens is, of course, associated with the genre and wrote the quintessential Christmas ghost story. Ironically, given its Christmas theme, God barely gets a look in in A Christmas Carol . There are only a dozen mentions of God - mostly in passing "God bless you"s or the singing of God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen. There is no mention of Christ, Jesus, or Saviour, and no one is seen going to church. So, what we have is a ghost story trading on a secular commercial Christmas so that Dickens and his publisher can sell a few
1 comment
Read more